2019 Mustang V6

Though a slick.

2019 mustang v6. The least expensive 2019 ford mustang is the 2019 ford mustang ecoboost 2dr coupe 2 3l 4cyl turbo 6m. 2019 ford mustang 3 7 v6 horsepower the 2019 ford mustang features a manufacturer s suggested retail price msrp starting around 26 750 for any turbocharged mustang with the ecoboost 4 cylinder and 6 speed manual transmission. You should already be familiar with the 2014 ford mustang v6 s specs so here s a quick refresher. Read reviews browse our car inventory and more.

Our tester is powered by a 3 7 liter v 6 making 305 hp and 280 lb ft of torque. The muscle car thrill innate to v 8 mustangs is on full display inside gt. 2020 mustang shelby gt500. Detailed features and specs for the 2019 ford mustang including fuel economy transmission warranty engine type cylinders drivetrain and more.

See good deals great deals and more on a 2019 ford mustang. With the 13 9 vs 14 1 second quarter miles between the ecoboost and v6 respectively it s a pretty tight match. Credit car and driver 2015 2017 mustang v6 a t 2015 2017 mustang ecoboost m t perf pack breaking down the facts. Compares the 2019 ford mustang where consumers can buy detailed info.

Including destination charge it arrives with a manufacturer s suggested retail price msrp. 275 hp 5 600 rpm. Mustang offers three available transmissions the 10 speed automatic tremec six speed manual and the tremec seven speed dual clutch transmission each designed to get the most out of your vehicle. 2019 mustang v6 specs the 2019 ford mustang incorporates a manufacturer s suggested retail price msrp starting around 26 750 for a turbocharged mustang with the ecoboost 4 cylinder and 6 speed manual transmission.

Search from 3 234 ford mustangs for sale including a new 2019 ford mustang gt convertible a new 2019 ford mustang gt coupe and a used 2019 ford mustang gt convertible. Standard on the shelby gt500 the all new tremec seven speed dual clutch transmission is the first ever dual clutch transmission in a mustang. As you can see the performance numbers between the two are relatively close in comparison.